ย
๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐, ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐.
โ๐ด๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐๐ โ๐๐ค๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ก๐๐ ๐ก. ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐ โ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ก.โ
๐ญ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฑ:๐ฎ๐ญ
โ๐โ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ค ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐โ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐คโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ , ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐.โ
๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ณ:๐ญ๐ญ
Truth does not fear verification and testing, so there is nothing wrong with checking what is true and what is not. We will therefore subject the verse ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด:๐ญ๐ต to truthfulness tests. This is the fourth part of reflections on this verse. I encourage you to look at the previous parts. We are considering which version of the text is true: the one speaking about baptism in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Spirit, or the one speaking about immersion in the name of Christ. Letโs begin.
๐. ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฑ๐ญ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ.
Examining the context, we find that the phrase โin the name of the Father, the Son, and the Spiritโ lacks syntactical quality, i.e., the true meaning of the verse is disturbed by an error in the linguistic pattern. However, if we read as below, the entire context fits together and the tenor of the instruction is complete:
โ๐ด๐๐ ๐๐ข๐กโ๐๐๐๐ก๐ฆ โ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐.. ๐กโ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐… ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐, ๐ก๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐ผ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข… ๐ผ ๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐ฆ๐๐ข…โ
๐. ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ง๐๐ฒ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ.
Is the phrase “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” used anywhere else in the Bible?
Nowhere!
Did Yeshu use the phrase “๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐” on other occasions?
Yes, ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ฌ, examples can be found in Matthew 18:20, Mark 9:37,39,41, in John 14:14,26 and 16:23.
๐. ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ.
Is there any argument in the Bible based on the three-name phrase or baptism in a triple name?
There is none!
Is there an argument in the Bible based on baptism in the name of Yeshu?
Yes! This argument is used in ๐ญ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ญ:๐ญ๐ฏ
โ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐ ๐ถโ๐๐๐ ๐ก? ๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐ค๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข? ๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐?โ
For Paul, it is obvious that the immersion refers to the Anointed One. From this verse, when carefully analyzed, it follows that disciples should be immersed in the name of the One who was crucified for them. The Father, in His wonderful love, gave us His beloved Son who was raised by the Spirit. It was our Lord Yeshu who was crucified and therefore in His name the disciples are to be immersed in water. The Father did not die, nor did the Spirit die, so immersion in their name is unjustified just as it is in Paulโs name.
โ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐ข๐๐๐ค๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ (baptized) ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ (baptized)? ๐พ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ (baptism) ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐กโ, ๐ ๐ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐ค๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ข๐ ๐ถโ๐๐๐ ๐ก ๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐๐๐ [๐กโ๐] ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐น๐๐กโ๐๐, ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ค๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ค๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ โ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐. ๐ผ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐ค๐ โ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐กโ ๐๐ ๐ป๐๐, ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ค๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐;โ
๐ฅ๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฒ:๐ฏ-๐ฑ
The insertion of the formula โin the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spiritโ into immersion is logically inconsistent with the gospel being preached. Trinity worshipers recognize only such baptism that took place in the name of three persons and accept only that as giving salvation. This reasoning is inconsistent with the teachings of the messengers who clearly proclaimed that:
โ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐, ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐กโ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ข๐๐๐๐ โ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐คโ๐๐โ ๐ค๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐.โ
๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ฐ:๐ญ๐ฎ
So, by their formula, supporters of the trinity nullify the teaching of the anointed messengers Peter and John that salvation is only in the name of Yeshu.
Based on just this argument, we can confirm the original text of Matthew 28:19 as containing the phrase “๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐.”
๐. ๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ.
Is there anything analogous in the Bible to immersion in a triple name?
There is not!
Is there anything analogous to immersion in the name of Yeshu?
Yes.
The Father immersed the disciples in the Holy Spirit, the promise that came according to Yeshu โ๐๐ ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐๐๐โ (John 14:26), because the Anointed One is the โconnectorโ both in water immersion and in immersion in the Spirit. This is demonstrated in the following quotes:
โ๐ต๐ข๐ก ๐ผ ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐กโ๐ ๐ก๐๐ข๐กโ: ๐ผ๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐ผ ๐๐ ๐๐ค๐๐ฆ. ๐น๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ผ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐ค๐๐ฆ, ๐กโ๐ ๐ถ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข. ๐ต๐ข๐ก ๐๐ ๐ผ ๐๐, ๐ผ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ป๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข.”
๐๐ผ๐ต๐ป ๐ญ๐ฒ:๐ณ
“๐ด๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ถ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐, ๐กโ๐ ๐ป๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก, ๐คโ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐น๐๐กโ๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐, ๐ป๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐โ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฆ๐กโ๐๐๐ ๐ผ โ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข.”
๐๐ผ๐ต๐ป ๐ญ๐ฐ:๐ฎ๐ฒ
“๐ต๐ข๐ก ๐คโ๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐โ๐๐๐๐, ๐คโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐โ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ โ๐ข ๐ถโ๐๐๐ ๐ก, ๐๐๐กโ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐.”
๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ด:๐ญ๐ฎ
Note that they were immersed as a result of preaching the name of Yeshu, not “the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.” By analogy, we should be immersed in the name of Yeshu, as this prepares us for immersion in the Spirit, who likewise is given ๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ (Acts 2:38-39, Acts 19:1-5, John 3:3-5).
๐. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฒ.
โ๐น๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐คโ๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ (baptized) ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐, โ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐๐กโ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐กโ๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐.”
๐๐ฎ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฏ:๐ฎ๐ณ
If you study the context of these words from the letter to the Galatians, you will realize that through immersion ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ we become sons of the Father and co-heirs of the promise given to Abraham. Introducing the phrase “in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Spirit” is, once again, contrary to the logic of the preached gospel of salvation. ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ is necessary for us to be adopted by the Father and granted the rights of inheritance after Abraham. We do not become co-heirs of the Father and the Holy Spirit. Whoever introduced the baptismal formula “in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Spirit” completely misunderstood the hope and principle of human salvation.
๐. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐๐.
Did the disciples ever immerse in the triple name after receiving the gospel?
Never!
Did they immerse in the name of Yeshu?
Always.
“๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐: ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐โ ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ โ๐ข ๐กโ๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ , ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ป๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก.”
๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ฎ:๐ฏ๐ด
โ๐ต๐ข๐ก ๐คโ๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐โ๐๐๐๐, ๐คโ๐ ๐ค๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ก ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ โ๐ข ๐ถโ๐๐๐ ๐ก, ๐๐๐กโ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐.โ
๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ด:๐ญ๐ฎ
โ๐ด๐๐ โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ โ๐ข ๐กโ๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐. ๐โ๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ โ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐ ๐ก๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ค ๐๐๐ฆ๐ .โ
๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ฌ:๐ฐ๐ด
โ๐โ๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ฆ โ๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ , ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ฟ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ โ๐ข.โ
๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ต:๐ฑ
Often, in defense of triune immersion, the argument is used that “I would rather follow the command in the words of Christ than model after the Acts of the Apostles.” However, this type of logic puts the messengers trained by the Messiah in a position of disobedience and makes all their immersions invalid. I do not accept such reasoning.
If you believe that the New Testament was created by the will and inspiration of God and is “๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐โ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐โ๐ก๐๐๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ โ๐ ๐ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก, ๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐” (2 Timothy 3:16-17), then you would not nullify the entire account for one verse. Especially since there are reasons to consider this verse as added later. As we pointed out at the beginning, everything must be checked to see whether what we read is confirmed and in accordance with the truth. The apostles were sent to preach and immerse after prior preparation. They know better than we do what Christ the Lord commanded them and how they were to carry out His orders.
๐. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ .
What significance is assigned in Scripture to immersing believers in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit?
None!
What significance is assigned to immersion in the name of Yeshu?
๐ ๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ, the Scriptures teach that immersion in the name of Yeshu is an act of repentance for the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:38).
๐๐๐๐จ๐ง๐, immersion in His name is linked with the promise of immersion in the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38).
๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐, immersion in the name of Yeshu is connected with our identification and personification of the death and burial of Christ (Romans 6:1-4 and Colossians 2:12).
๐ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ๐ก, immersion in the name of Yeshu means that we clothe ourselves with Christ (Galatians 3:27).
๐ ๐ข๐๐ญ๐ก, immersion in His name is called the circumcision of the Anointed and reflects the removal of the old man of sin. This way we become a new creation in the Messiah (Colossians 2:11-12, 2 Corinthians 5-17).
Baptism in a triple name can only reflect faith in the Trinitarian doctrine and the human creed created to support that faith.
๐. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ฅ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ข๐๐ฌ.
Thanks to God’s care, the text of ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด:๐ญ๐ต is not the only record in the gospels of our Lord. Luke also recorded this event with great accuracy. In ๐๐๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฐ:๐ฐ๐ฒ-๐ฐ๐ณ it is written about the Son of God speaking in the third person:
“๐ฐ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐โ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ , ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐ฝ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐๐๐๐.”
๐๐๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฐ:๐ฐ๐ณ
This very passage restores the correct text of the gospel of Matthew 28:19, where Yeshu speaks in the first person: “๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐.”
Furthermore, the gospel of Mark similarly records this message using similar words:
“๐บ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ค๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐โ ๐กโ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ข๐๐! ๐โ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐, ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐; ๐๐ข๐ก ๐คโ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ด๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐ ๐คโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐: ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ก ๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ …”
๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ญ๐ฒ:๐ญ๐ฑ-๐ญ๐ด
Although Mark greatly expands the command, there is nothing about the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit there, similarly in Lukeโs account. To be truthful, in Matthew there is also nothing about the Father and Spirit, if we consider the version known and used by Eusebius. Let us recall that his version of Matthew 28:19 is:
“๐บ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐, ๐ก๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐ผ โ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข.”
๐. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ช๐ฎ๐จ๐ญ๐๐ฌ.
While there is no text that offers a laudatory quote using the triune phrase, there is a striking similarity between Matthew 28:19 after correction, and Romans 1:4-5. Notice the following parallels:
“๐บ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐, ๐ก๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐ผ โ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข.”
๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด:๐ญ๐ต-๐ฎ๐ฌ
“๐ฌ๐๐ค ๐ฌ๐๐จ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ค ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐บ๐ค๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ค๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ค ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐จ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐ฃ๐๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐จ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ ๐๐ ๐ค๐๐ง ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐๐จ๐๐๐, ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐๐ช๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ค๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ค๐๐ฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐๐ช๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ค๐๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐๐จ ๐๐๐ง ๐๐๐จ ๐ฃ๐๐ข๐โ๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ง๐.”
๐ฅ๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ญ:๐ฐ-๐ฑ
“๐๐” = “๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ … ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐”
“๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ … ๐ก๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐” = “๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ … ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐”
“๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ” = “๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐”
“๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐” = “๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐”
๐๐. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐.
It is written:
“๐ด๐๐ ๐คโ๐๐ก๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐๐, ๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฆ๐กโ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฟ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ โ๐ข, ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐น๐๐กโ๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐ข๐โ ๐ป๐๐.”
๐๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฏ:๐ญ๐ณ
The message formulated by Paul is clear. The word “๐คโ๐๐ก๐๐ฃ๐๐” includes everything and certainly also includes immersion, as it includes both word and deed. The traditional wording in ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด:๐ญ๐ต using the triple name is not in accordance with this principle. However, the shorter phrase is. This proves which phrase is forged. The Word of God does not contradict itself, but complements itself.
Paul not only preached this principle but also applied it in the context of immersion. In ๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ต:๐ญ-๐ฑ we find disciples of John who had been immersed during his ministry. Just like immersion in the name of Yeshu, John’s immersion was for repentance (๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ญ:๐ฐ, ๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ฎ:๐ฏ๐ด). John preached in his immersion that one would come after him who would take away the sins of the world and will be immersing with the Holy Spirit.
“๐โ๐๐ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐ถ๐๐๐๐๐กโ, ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐ข๐โ ๐กโ๐ ๐ข๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ , ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐ธ๐โ๐๐ ๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ . ๐ป๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐: ๐ท๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ป๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก ๐คโ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐? ๐ด๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ โ๐๐: ๐๐ โ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐ฃ๐๐ โ๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐กโ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ป๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก. ๐โ๐๐ก ๐กโ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐? – โ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐. ๐ด๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐๐: ๐ฝ๐โ๐โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐. ๐ฝ๐โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐, ๐ก๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐คโ๐ ๐ค๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐ โ๐๐, ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐๐ โ๐ข – ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐๐. ๐พ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ณ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐.”
๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ต:๐ญ-๐ฑ
Paul applied this principle and immersed them in the name of the Lord Yeshu. And so, by using the practice test, we find strong confirmation for the phrase in “๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐.”
To these 10 tests, I would add an eleventh. Let’s call it the witness credibility test.
๐๐. ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ.
“๐๐๐ค ๐กโ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ผ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข. ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.”
๐ฎ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ญ๐ฏ:๐ญ
So that itโs clear this principle isnโt based on just one verse, I provide several others confirming the importance of multiple witnesses – 1 Timothy 5:19; 1 Timothy 6:12; 2 Timothy 2:2; Hebrews 10:28.
The Bible instructs us in important matters to rely on several witnesses. According to biblical command, one witness in crucial matters is unreliable. Certainly, in the matter of the mode of immersion, we are dealing with a very important issue, as it is conditions our salvation. It is actually hard to imagine anything more important, so the biblical principle should be applied here, and the Creator, if He wanted to convey something to us, would base it on a minimum of two witnesses.
Since, therefore, in the New Testament we have only one verse, and that a very doubtful one at that, which speaks about baptism in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Spirit, and many more verses speaking about immersion in the name of Yeshu, the matter is settled.
“๐โ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐, ๐ค๐ ๐ก๐๐, ๐ ๐ข๐๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก ๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ก๐๐ก๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ค๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ , โ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ก [๐ ๐๐] ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ , ๐๐๐ก ๐ข๐ ๐๐ข๐ [๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ก๐๐ค๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐] ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ ๐ก๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐ [๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐ก] ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ .”
๐๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ฎ:๐ญ
Therefore, we accept the true version of the gospel in Matthew 28:19 as:
“๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐.”
Article from 14th December 2014
Author: Krzysztof Krรณl
Translated: Michaล Karpiej


